Ive been preparing for the artistic return of me, I just had a couple of things in my mind, sort of blocked, eager to erupt in order to make sense, and I successfully made it, now I kind of move on with the mental path flowing more properly, but well, no need to write about that here, it will reflect in the stories.
Im mostly done with my hispanic-catholic studies, it is still interesting and I rather like them than any other, buuut… Im not one of them, I would rather move on with what youre going to see here, Im gonna call it “naturalism”, for the lack of a better word, and with that concept I can relate it to a history explanation, which Im gonna do either now or later, whatever it feels as I write.
First of all, Im gonna stop treating this as a product, it is not a product, it cannot be shilled, marketed, godspelled, whatever, it is not a product, it cannot be a product, I may do products one day but that will come, if it ever, much later, or in another circumstances.
So everything storyrelated I will keep here, whoever reads it good, whoever wont, fine. It is impossible to market, especially with what comes later in the story, it is a very, heavy, story.
So, “naturalism”, of course when there is not a central line, it can be a broad range of thoughts and beliefs, but the center is me so Im gonna manage two, a historic concept and the one you will see in the stories.
Theres a division between communal organization and a state sanctioned way of life, you may think that one inspires to “grow” and reach the other, but, depends… think of the fall of rome, the tyrannic, slave producing, elite centered, prosperous yet grinding, imposed order.
Of course you still have roads, and this and that high cost maintenance things, and after migrations settled somehow, what you really have is a comunal way of life, there wasnt much large distance commerce nor taxes, so work and production was focused on local necessities, and of course you didnt have the post industrial never ending profit that consumes our modern lives without rest, nor the ridiculously large populations every day needy.
So your little hispanic town organized and made a council, which in turn also organized with the next town and so, its called “natural order”, how people figure it out on their own. At that point crowns werent that powerful, neither nobles, they represented, they took care of “bigger” things, but they wouldnt mess with the local organization, something you can call “fueros”, in english something like “places”.
There are two thoughts about the first christians, one is the belief of tradition, which is the chain from “godsaves” to apostles to church, which I dont need to explain. The second thought is that nobody was really godly, and they were all basically a bunch of what nowdays you would normally call “hippies”, like monks who segregated from society to make their own communities, men and women together, with the high value of relationship and “love”, a natural order to follow for things to work out. You dont like it? youre out to be on your own, that was the sanction. Of course there was also the dude who would just climb so high out of reach and stayed there, “praying” or whatever.
The point is, at the beginning, there wasnt the rules we now know, those didnt exist, they made it on their own with the knowledge they had. If you go with the church, they built tradition; if you go with the “hippies”, what would you call it, what about, “naturalism”?
What really happened? I dont know, I wasnt there, by far. Though theres a trick in all of these, “godsaves” is truth, so nothing else can be, so the else goes into eternal conflict because they are waiting for their own.
Going back to my line, nowdays you have your stupid idolatry to a nation you have little to do with, back then identity was through ethnicity and religion (“forbidden” in the liberal order as they impose the idea of nation instead). You know, something like, “the other town across the mountains are a bunch of weirdos, but they have a beautiful church with a mass in latin, when I go I feel like home, so theyre probably good folks after all”.
You may have the idea of king as a willful ruler on a wimp, but thats also not accurate, they relied on nobles and fueros. But something happened… “some freaks on the greek side are saying the holy spirit does not come from the son, only the father, can you fucking believe it?!” or something like that and the church divided in two, just like rome.
Another line goes like “he wasnt god, so he wasnt the truth, so other seekers of truth can go along as well, aint that nice mr emperor? this way you can rule overall more easily!” the very first absolutism that took over but failed because “they have the buildings but we have the faith”.
Then saint Isabel established the (back then) modern “spain”, forged with the will of warrior kings and blood of countless martyrs, she finally put it together so they were blessed as the chosen people. Yet they had the mark of the original sin, the flesh was weak… destiny tied them with land of the east… which were not consecrated to Mary in proper time and form, she being the natural union between mortal and divine, so they fell into the abyss.
In time of Isabel there was a war with, yuck, france, which wanted to invade what nowdays is called “italy”. They were defeated not only militarily but also with a political alliance surrounding “the first daughter of the church”. I think something probably happened at the border of rome and the germanic tribes (that later invaded and eventually formed what you now call european countries), the friction was so much that it probably opened a vortex and countless demons attached to the material world, and spread with the migration.
So there comes Juana, the only daughter of Isabel left, politically married to some insufferable wanna be french narcissist, who comes from, guess where? remember the vortex? it had a shape of a twisted cross, the horizontal line is the european swamps, the vertical line goes from, yuck, france, to all the way to the infidel dark lands.
The liberal era hates Isabel because she expelled those who were chosen before her and her kind, so nowdays they ridiculously say Juana was not crazy, she was, very crazy, yet intelligent and loyal, she didnt have the strenght of her mother to fight against the demons that were above after the brotherly war and blood spilled, as her dynasty was born. The narcissistic fool? lol, he died, who would have thought?! lol, dead, and those who remained from before by “supporting” him, prepared the way for the rightful king to come back. Much later, when Juanas son was king, there was a rebellion because he was too much attached to those land of the vortex, they reach the castle she was imprisoned in, she said “yes, punish the bad in my name, come and tell me all”, yet she never gave them anything, at all, she did not betray neither the memory of her father (and probably the one of the husband too) nor her son as king, at a time she could have obtained all glory. Of course they threatened her with everything, without the queen on their side, the rebellion fell and their heads rolled later.
What I was talking about? oh yeah, naturalism, yeeeah… in short, some people embraced the vortex and “protested” instead of reforming or creating tradition, there was huge wars won by the good side, until the late part where the corruption of the good broke their structure, their kings were weak and nobles ate it all. The war was so big that with the conflict going on, a new wave of absolutism came over, “I am king because of might, and I rule over all, all sides of the war…”, the catholic spanish saved once paris from the protested horde, but they are not, notorious to be thankful.
Anyway, absolutism was then tried in hispanic lands too, in order to keep up with the war, and failed terribly. In short, the absolute french won the war at the very end and the hispanic empire broke, the island at the north could have been good, but certain queen was not able to bear a child, and died in a deep, oh so very deep sadness, if she saw the future in a vision… she is probably the saddenest person to ever live, so, so, sad… if you ever see her image, think about her sadness. Then the witch ugly sister took over and all was lost.
The lands east of france, ugh, wont even talk about. So aaaalll of those demon worshipers designed a new order, because even with monarchies being corrupted and falling, they were still of the natural order that was created from good, or god, or both (hippies or tradition or both), they needed to replace it with something else, “the positive order”.
Its all kinds of people in elites that were already stablished, who jumped ship to the other one, and remained on top one way or another, the class conflict is used as a lure for people to accept the new order, Im not saying it didnt exist, Im not saying it cannot be mitigated, Im saying it wont be solved, it is used to create an idolatry to the new order. The main operatives were mostly military, killing masses of people, from the french revolution to the world wars.
The consejos were taken by the central powers with ayuntamientos, the communal lands were expropriated, in the americas some remained in some form, as the rural (mostly native) people were the bravest defenders of the old order, up all the way to the cristeros, who if where not betrayed by the foreign leadership, would have defeated the positive revolution. Then industry came and turned life into profit. Cristeros in america and carlistas in spain were the very last line of defense, but the positive order prevailed in the end and their existence went into the shadows.
Of course Im skipping that time before when what was left of the hispanic crown disappeared, or how they butchered each other later in the war between liberals near ww2.
“But we vote now!” you sure do.
Me? I dont like much at all, even when I sound like I take a side.
What Im going with all of these, is the difference not only between the natural and the positive order, but also the natural law and the institutional natural law, for example, if you think the first christians and monks were “hippies”, then later with the orders of this and that, it was instituted things not very “communal”, like servants were introduced, chastity, segregation of sexes, classes as they were not “equal” anymore, oh, and holiness.
Thats pretty much on the political and historical side, next time will be more about the insides of naturalism, on the Aurorish side.
++++++++++
Help me feed the birds!!
Buy me a Coffee
++++++++++
Like this:
Like Loading...
AuAu Over 
You must be logged in to post a comment.